February 2024

edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, in your recent edit to Espen Knutsen, you added links to an article which did not add content or meaning, or repeated the same link several times throughout the article. Please see Wikipedia's guideline on links to avoid overlinking. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 09:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Mike D. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 12:53, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Beck, you may be blocked from editing. Denisarona (talk) 12:54, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Francis Lawrence. Denisarona (talk) 12:56, 6 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 08:39, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the Manual of Style, as you did at Nick Carter. Renewal6 (talk) 15:05, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Second block for WP:OVERLINKING

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:06, 21 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

April 2024 (after second block lift for overlinking)

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Maynard James Keenan, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Per MOS:UNLINKDATES, we shouldn't be linking to dates unless those dates are likely to be of interest to the reader. Linking to them from a biography isn't likely to qualify. EducatedRedneck (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Please read What generally should not be linked to get a better idea of what should and should not be linked in an article. signed, Willondon (talk) 18:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  PhilKnight (talk) 18:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)Reply