173.79.49.8

August 2020

Hi. Welcome to Wikipedia, and thanks for working to improve the site with your edit to Tony Vlachos, as we really appreciate your participation. However, the edit had to be reverted, because Wikipedia cannot accept uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. If you ever have any other questions about editing, or need help regarding the site's policies, just let me know by leaving a message for me in a new section at the bottom of my talk page. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 02:48, 18 August 2020 (UTC)

October 2020

Please refrain from making non-constructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did when you removed entire passages and citations and replaced them with [[ WP:NOR|your own personal analyses]] with these edits to Tony Vlachos. These edits constitute vandalism, and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 22:30, 20 October 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:39, 30 October 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 20:25, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

June 2021

Please cease your disruptive edits. Your recent edits to Tony Vlachos were reverted for two reasons:

First, you blanked content, including the citations that supported that content, from the article, but without providing a rationale for this in an edit summary. When removing material, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page.

Second, you replaced the blanked content with two paragraphs of uncited material. Wikipedia requires that the material in its articles be accompanied by reliable, verifiable (usually secondary) sources explicitly cited in the article text in the form of an inline citation, which you can learn to make here. Thanks. Nightscream (talk) 03:01, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 00:57, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

3RR and edit warring

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Canterbury Tail talk 14:27, 28 January 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Star Wars: Episode III – Revenge of the Sith. 4TheWynne (talk • contribs) 01:40, 13 February 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Edit warring block

For your continued long term, slow editing edit warring and disruptive editing you've been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia. Canterbury Tail talk 16:16, 5 June 2022 (UTC)

---