173.62.200.237

Maintenance tags and sourced material

Please do not removed maintenance tags without adding or improving the article. Sourced material should not be removed without discussion. Your edits appear to be vandalism. Pjefts (talk) 00:35, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 10 May

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Holly Woodlawn page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:25, 11 May 2016 (UTC)

Sandbox

Please don't edit in other users' sandboxes, unless of course, if you are that user. Thanks... 172.58.41.167 (talk) 02:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

Edit summaries

Please start using edit summaries. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Edit_summary#Always_provide_an_edit_summary Thanks. Pjefts (talk) 12:41, 23 May 2016 (UTC)

June 2016

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Rock balancing. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vensco (T | C) 00:52, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Copying within Wikipedia requires proper attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from History of feminism into Fourth wave of feminism. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:21, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Manifesto of the 343 has been reverted.
Your edit here to Manifesto of the 343 was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://manifesto343.wordpress.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Criticism of religion template

Instead of copying the template, just invoke it with {{criticism of religion}} (leave off the nowiki stuff) Then, the content of criticism of religion will be updated within the article. See wp:templates especially Help:A quick guide to templates Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:00, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia

I see you've already been warned about this. I reverted similar edits at List of female United States presidential and vice-presidential candidates. Please read and follow the rules.--S Philbrick(Talk) 20:23, 30 July 2016 (UTC)

I see you are still not adding the required attribution, as required under the terms of the CC-by-SA license. Please have a look at this edit summary as an example of how it is done. Please let me know if you still don't understand what to do or why we have to do it. Thanks, — Diannaa (talk) 00:49, 6 August 2016 (UTC)

And again today, on the article Timeline of antisemitism, where you copied from T. S. Eliot. Please stop wasting our time and do it correctly. Thank you, — Diannaa (talk) 00:24, 21 August 2016 (UTC)

September 2016

Hello, I'm NgYShung. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nicholas Chamberlain, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. NgYShung ^huh? 14:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Timeline of women's legal rights (other than voting) have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Timeline of women's legal rights (other than voting) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/208/412/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:29, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Timeline of women's legal rights in the United States (other than voting). Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it.  
Your edit here to Timeline of women's legal rights in the United States (other than voting) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/208/412/) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 17:31, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Reference errors on 7 November

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the Pantsuit page, your edit caused an unnamed parameter error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:22, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Timeline of feminism

It has been proposed that Timeline of feminism be merged into Timeline of second-wave feminism. Seeking your feedback at Talk:Timeline of feminism#Merge discussion. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 12:02, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

---