September 2011

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Blue Mountain High School, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

October 2011

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to History of ancient Egypt, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Vrenator (talk) 14:55, 7 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Blue Mountains (Oregon), did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jenna Marbles. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jenna Marbles, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

November 2011

edit

Hello, and welcome! Although everyone is welcome to contribute, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Hooverville with this edit, did not appear to be constructive, and has been reverted or removed. Thank you! ~ Arjun 18:15, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Hooverville with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. ~ Arjun 18:17, 16 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Gameinformer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. SG2090 01:31, 3 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

January 2012

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Snowboarding, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. -- RandorXeus. 14:16, 6 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Prolog (talk) 08:27, 7 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

April 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Dynastic cycle, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Taoism in Korea. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

May 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Lowell Mason, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "{{helpme}}" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Lowell Mason was changed by 173.231.92.13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.88663 on 2012-05-10T14:37:13+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:37, 10 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Johann Stamitz. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hector Berlioz, you may be blocked from editing. —Bruce1eetalk 13:38, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hector Berlioz, you will be blocked from editing without further notice.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Hector Berlioz was changed by 173.231.92.13 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.936193 on 2012-05-11T18:44:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:44, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf(talk) 18:47, 11 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

November 2012

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Beavis with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. sumone10154(talk) 18:56, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Heinrich Hertz with this edit. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 18:59, 13 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Talk:Anglo war

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Talk:Anglo war, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Legoktm (talk) 19:26, 19 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Prolog (talk) 19:08, 20 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

November 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Plantsurfer. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Isotopes of nitrogen because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Plantsurfer (talk) 14:07, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Trousers. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Trousers with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Alex discussion 19:33, 25 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your edits to Emmitt Smith

edit

  This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Emmitt Smith. Petrb (talk) 16:05, 5 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of two years for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  Yunshui  15:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.