April 2019 edit
Hello, I'm Dusti. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Mehta Kalu— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Dusti*Let's talk!* 08:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Mata Tripta. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Dusti*Let's talk!* 08:08, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
Your contention about a source edit
While I understand that you feel cited material from "ReligionFacts.com" is not an appropriate source, you cannot simply decide to unilaterially remove something that is already cited in an article. You, alone, do not get to decide what can and cannot remain on Wikipedia. The information that you're deleting has been in these articles for quite some time (it appears it was accessed and added around 2014). You are now doing what is called edit warring. Please stop. The page needs to be reverted back to the last stable version and you can take your disagreement to the talk page for community consensus. Dusti*Let's talk!* 08:18, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
It"s a blog. Blogs are not allowed in Wiki. It does not matter for how long that info has stayed here on Wiki. 171.61.199.202 (talk)
- A blog 'could' be used as a source - Here's a link to Wikipedia's requirements for sourcing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dusti (talk • contribs) 08:31, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
April 2019 edit
Your recent editing history at Mata Tripta shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:19, 2 April 2019 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 08:31, 2 April 2019 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 | This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |