March 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Ttwaring. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to We Shall Overcome has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Ttwaring (talk) 15:35, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at We Shall Overcome. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: We Shall Overcome was changed by 169.244.21.104 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.888328 on 2016-03-08T16:36:42+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:36, 8 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at First Battle of Bull Run. Chris vLS (talk) 15:31, 1 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Isabelle Belato. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kenny Loggins—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Isabelle 🔔 14:42, 11 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

March 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Steuben—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 15:33, 4 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ellsworth. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Serols (talk) 16:13, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Ellsworth, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 16:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ellsworth, Maine. Serols (talk) 16:14, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jake Wartenberg (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply