October 2021

edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Serzh Sargsyan. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 13:06, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello, I'm Lazy Maniik. I noticed that in this edit to 2021 in Tajikistan, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Maniik 🇮🇳Any Help🇮🇳? Contact Me. 03:01, 15 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Gurbanguly Berdimuhamedow, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Notfrompedro (talk) 13:57, 18 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ZaniGiovanni (talk) 13:54, 11 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Edit warring at Serzh Sargsyan

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard]. EdJohnston (talk) 15:32, 12 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

November 2021

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. · • SUM1 • · (talk) 04:15, 4 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit=warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  User:Ymblanter (talk) 20:38, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I'm 139.192.151.122, I have a question, Why i can be blocked, and what the page i do edit warring?. 139.192.151.122 02:14, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Please read all the messages that have been left for you above (starting at the top of the page), and then ask us if there is anything you don't understand. Your recent one-week block was issued per a complaint at WP:ANI, "User on successive Jakartan IPs engaging in year-long disruptive editing of the same articles". The blocking administrator was User:Ymblanter. You were also blocked in October per a complaint at WP:AN3 about edit warring at Serzh Sargsyan. EdJohnston (talk) 02:40, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 months for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ST47 (talk) 04:57, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Hello, I'm 139.192.151.122, I have a question, Why i can be blocked, and what the page i do edit warring?. 139.192.151.122 05:01, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

You can look at your contribution and decide for yourself.--Ymblanter (talk) 06:20, 15 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

So why i can be blocked by ST47? 139.192.151.122 04:58, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply