124x247x221x146

Stop reverting without reason

Hi, I've seen that you have made several nonconstructive edits to airport and aviation-related articles on Wikipedia. Just consider this: Many people spend lots of their time here, creating and improving articles for the public's use. Any time that you have the urge to vandalize or delete content, think of all the people that spend their time trying to improve and better the information on Wikipedia. If you feel that you must do something on Wikipedia, instead of vandalizing this information, think of expanding and making it better. Think of this the next time that you hit the Edit this Page button. See also Wikipedia:Avoid the word "vandal".

Toyotaboy95 - Hong Kong ☺

Second Warning

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

Comment, I have noticed that you have reverted many edits made by users on numerous airport and airline-related pages on Wikipedia. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing in the future. Moreover, regarding Hong Kong International Airport, please re-read what you are reverting. Cathay Pacific Airways indeed operations seasonal flights packaged with CXHolidays to Langkawi and some other Asian destinations while note that on the article page, it does not mention that HKIA is a focus city for Air India or Virgin Atlantic / Qantas. It only says that they are stopovers. The only actual airline that has HKIA has a focus city is Air New Zealand, as per official Star Alliance Reference Guide.Toyotaboy95 - Hong Kong ☺ 08:46, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Final Warning

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. I have also notified relevant administrators. Toyotaboy95 - Hong Kong ☺ 12:33, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Block discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Toyotaboy95 - Hong Kong ☺ 12:39, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Formatting of Seasonal Destinations at Airport pages.

Please refer to Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Airports#Formatting_of_seasonal_destinations. It's been agreed upon that Seasonal destinations are split into a separate line, so kindly stop undoing/reverting the changes that editors have done on the various Airport pages. 203.214.121.41 (talk) 23:38, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

September 2010

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Silchar Airport, you may be blocked from editing. Shovon (talk) 09:51, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Cooch Behar Airport

Wikipedia policy regarding airline and airport articles says that "you're in no way obliged to follow all, or even any, of these guidelines to contribute an article". Please follow: Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports/page content and Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Layout (Airports). Regular charter service with published schedules can be included in the articles. This is not against Wikipedia policy. You also have reverted the edits of native name of this airport without any valid reason. So kindly stop undoing/reverting the changes for vandalizing. never stop flying (talk) 18:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

ANI discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Disruptive edits of User: 124x247x221x146. Thank you. HeyMid (contributions) 13:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Hong Kong International Airport

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Toyotaboy95 (talk) 01:36, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Some advice

RE my uw-3rr and the report at WP:ANI

I asked fellow admin MilborneOne to look over the situation. He is of the opinion that your editing is generally in good faith, but there are a few problems. Firstly, you need to use edit summaries to give some clue to other editors what changes you have made to the article. Secondly, the Wikipedia editing process is BRD - i.e. you make a bold edit to an article, another editor reverts it, then you discuss the issue on the article's talk page. The process is not BRRRRRRRRRRR...!

I'm sure that you don't want to get yourself blocked from editing. So, please slow down a little. If an edit you make gets reverted, please raise it on the talk page of the article in question and let the reverting editor know that you have done so. The merits of the change can then be discussed and maybe a compromise reached as to changes to the article. - Failure to discuss issues and further edit warring will result in you being blocked. Mjroots (talk) 06:23, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

BLR to CMB

Hi, I've seen that you keep removing CMB as an IT destination out of BLR. FYI IT will be resuming flights to CMB from 31st Oct. pdf's or excel schedules are updated on a regular basis and are valuable sources of reference. The actual schedule that you are talking about also mentions a direct flight from BLR to CMB from 31st Oct. This flight is non-existent on 30th Oct. Here's the link, pls have a look at it then think whether you have to remove CMB from IT's destibation list. IT schedules (Abhishek191288 (talk) 13:52, 25 September 2010 (UTC))

• • While this flight still does show up in the Excel and Adobe downloadable timetables, its launch has been cancelled by IT. The downloadable schedules are not updated every day and the ones available right now were last updated on 17 September - and the flight was pulled after that. If you try to make a booking from BLR-CMB, you will find that you will be routed through MAA.Check it out! 124x247x221x146 (talk) 08:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Not the right way to go about it...

124x247x221x146, I've blocked you for three hours for edit warring. In particular at Chennai International Airport, but I've seen similar behaviour at other airport articles.

I've opted for a short block, because I understand the frustration of dealing with ever-changing IP addresses, but edit warring is not the right way to solve the problem.

Once your block expires, what I'd like to see is:

• Make at least some effort to communicate with the current IP. Raise the issue on the articles' talkpages (I can't see any comment by you at Talk:Chennai International Airport, for example).
• If that doesn't solve it, request article protection at WP:RFPP.

There are mechanisms like RFPP that exist to help editors in situation like yours. But edit warring is not of them. Please don't do it.

Usual block notice: if you feel this block is unfair, you can request an {{unblock}} using:

{{unblock|replace this with your reason for being unblocked}}.

TFOWR 09:44, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Cooch Behar Airport

Wikipedia policy regarding airline and airport articles says that "you're in no way obliged to follow all, or even any, of these guidelines to contribute an article". Please follow: Wikipedia:WikiProject Airports/page content and Wikipedia:WikiProject Aviation/Style guide/Layout (Airports). Regular charter service with published schedules can be included in the articles. This is not against Wikipedia policy. You also have reverted the edits of native name of this airport without any valid reason. So kindly stop undoing/reverting the changes for vandalizing. never stop flying (talk) 18:06, 22 September 2010 (UTC)

Please read before editing

Please stop doing what you think is "right" and read WP:Airports and WP:Airlines before editing!! It's getting really tiring to constantly revert your edits that are nonsense. Could you also take the advice of the above users to talk on the talkpages of the relevant articles before getting involved in an edit war. Toyotaboy95 (talk) 12:25, 30 September 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SpiceJet destinations

A tag has been placed on SpiceJet destinations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Seduisant (talk) 21:54, 2 October 2010 (UTC)

October 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on SpiceJet destinations. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:46, 3 October 2010 (UTC)

January 2011

Welcome and thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead. Thank you. Someone65 (talk) 08:50, 18 January 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)