109.76.139.209

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ocean's 8. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 00:57, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Hang on, you can disagree with my edits but you can't dismiss them as vandalism.

That article from the Irish reviewer had more context and it said that Oceans 8 got better reviews than Oceans 12. Point is male reviewers were more than happy to trash Oceans 12 but gave more favorable reviews to Oceans 8. You can choose not to include the Irish reviewer but I didn't think his remarks had adequate context.

I would also direct your attention to WP:OVERLINK. Most people know what average means, and if they want to know more about review aggregators then the best pages to read are the specific page for Rotten Tomatoes or Metacritic and anything more generalized is actually unhelpful.

Then I thought the copy was being a unnecessarily verbose, and maybe a bit defensive by including "According to several media outlets" so I shortened that. -- 109.76.139.209 (talk) 01:07, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Content dispute

Your recent editing history at Ocean's 8 shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Dan56 (talk) 01:10, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Please read my comment above. Is there a particular part of it that you disagree with? I'd happily see you delete the comment from the Irish reviewer, I don't think it is notable, but I thought it needed more context. -- 109.76.139.209 (talk) 01:13, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

I have retained your unlinking and phrasing to Rotten Tomatoes, but the use of "lukewarm" was responded to at the talk page. Your bold change to this specific language has been reverted. The current phrasing is the result of past discussion with several editors, including one who offered this compromise revision ("According to several..."), which your edits undo. Please use the talk page to further address this matter; do not restore your preferred revision. If you believe I am wrong in my defense of "lukewarm" and that other editors might agree with you instead, then open an RfC or get a third opinion. But continuing to revert is not the right way to go. Dan56 (talk) 01:20, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

I also went to restore the text but your edit went through first.

We can disagree without the need to call edits vandalism. I think a single revert was a fair response to that.

It is a minor issue, I've registered my disagreement on the Talk page. -- 109.76.139.209 (talk) 01:38, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

Your edits

Regarding this, why are you still doing it, given what has been stated here? Also see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Removing helpful wikilinks from the Critical reception section. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 09:59, 25 December 2018 (UTC)

---