101.0.94.153

You are the one who is improperly moving other peoples comments. You may not tell other people where they may participate in an RFC. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 04:39, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Please look at the earlier request for comment that I linked to. That RFC happened in 2008, and there have been other RFCs in the past year which were structured the same way. The fact that a person starting an RFC can create a separate section for uninvolved editors has been standard for about six years. 101.0.94.153 (talk) 04:45, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

You can "request" all you want. You CANNOT set up screen for who can comment and you CANNOT move or alter my comment.-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 04:52, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 04:52, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

I suggest you read WP:TPO, and quit trying to provoke TRPoD. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:37, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Do you not see a problem with TheRedPenOfDoom classifying himself as an "outsider", even though he is one of the original parties in the dispute? His changing the section headings so that his comment is under "Comments by outsiders" seems deliberately misleading. 101.0.94.153 (talk) 05:47, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Edit_warring#User:TheRedPenOfDoom_reported_by_User:101.0.94.153_.28Result:_.29

When you report a user for something like edit warring, you MUST notify them on their talk page. I have done this for you, but please remember to do so in the future. ♥ Solarra ♥ ^{♪ 話 ♪} ߷ _{♀ 投稿 ♀} 06:20, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/101.0.94.173, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Vanamonde93 (talk) 06:54, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

Race and Intelligence

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the intersection of race/ethnicity and human abilities and behaviour, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Robert McClenon (talk) 14:29, 1 July 2014 (UTC)

---