100.38.165.179

Hello,

This is Fazeelat Aslam.

I am not American. I am Pakistani, I am trying to amend this revision and I see you keep reverting to it, I'm not sure why.(74.65.196.210 (talk) 23:27, 17 September 2015 (UTC))

July 2017

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:05, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charles D. Anderson, you may be blocked from editing.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:08, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

ANI

I have started a thread about you here.
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 14:50, 5 July 2017 (UTC)

Heads up

Just giving you a fair warning on this. If you don't very quickly learn how to use a talk page you're likely to find yourself blocked from editing. You are being fairly openly disruptive, and you should probably find something better to you with your time and do it somewhere around now. TimothyJosephWood 14:47, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

What's disruptive? Moving slave owners to the slave owner category which existed long before these edits?

Well, there are particular ways things work around here, and that's pretty much the way things have to work in order for every one to actually get along and manage to make an encyclopedia together. With very few exceptions, pretty much regardless of the content, if you make a change to an article and someone disagrees, usually indicated by reverting your change, then you are expected to to go the article talk page, discuss the disagreement, and reach some type of consensus. This is called the Bold, Revert, Discuss Cycle.

What you were doing, repeatedly reverting multiple editors to maintain your preferred version across a dozen or more articles, is basically the opposite of that, and is why you found yourself with a short block. TimothyJosephWood 15:17, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

July 2017

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  RickinBaltimore (talk) 14:53, 6 July 2017 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

April 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to St. Ignatius College Prep have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 16:02, 25 April 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---