Welcome!

edit

Hi 0eaceful! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! I see you made edits to Rape in Islamic law. Please join the discussion at Talk:Rape_in_Islamic_law#WP:NOR.VR talk 23:06, 20 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Rape in Islamic law

edit

Hi there! With all due respect, you appear to be mistaken. The sources do specifically say that men can forcibly marry slaves. Please self-revert and stop edit warring and misrepresenting sources, or you will find yourself facing potential sanctions, bans, blocks, and/or investigations. Thanks! GrammarDamner how are things? 17:07, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Show me where if your right I will revert. 0eaceful (talk) 17:11, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Page 252 of The Legal and Social Status of Women in the Hadith Literature states, "if the slave's master was a Muslim he could give her in marriage without her consent". Please self-revert, thanks! GrammarDamner how are things? 17:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

Ok 0eaceful (talk) 17:20, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

 

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. VR talk 17:39, 21 August 2020 (UTC)Reply