Āditya

Welcome

Hello Āditya, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of Contents

• Department directory

Need help?

• Questions — a guide on where to ask questions.
• Cheatsheet — quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes.
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars — an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
• Article Wizard — a Wizard to help you create articles

• The Simplified Ruleset — a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules.
• Guide to Wikipedia — A thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia.

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia — a guide on how you can help.

• Community Portal — Wikipedia's hub of activity.

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Āditya, good luck, and have fun. --Shinerunner (talk) 21:05, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Reply

"...it seems you want contents you like" - it's totally incorrect. I'm not to decide what can and what cannot be added, it's our policies and guidelines. First, I welcome you to Wikipedia. Secondly, speculations about a sequel to Andaz Apna Apna, supported by mostly unreliable sources, are not really notable, particularly if a sequel never was even planned. It is particularly irrelevant in the section of "reception". Shahid • ^Talk2me 14:27, 25 December 2009 (UTC)

Reported following on WP:ANI...

---

The User:Shshshsh has reverted my edits to article Andaz Apna Apna 2 times saying that my addition about info about sequel to the movie is irrelevent and speculations were supported by unreliable sources. I am giving below references from those media about which article on wikipedia exists. If these are 'unreliable sources' then better to delete articles about these media.

• The Times of India

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/entertainment/bollywood/news-interviews/Salman-Aamir-tie-up/articleshow/5096182.cms

• Zee News

http://www.zeenews.com/news467473.html

• The Indian Express

http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Return-of-the-Native/259624/

• The Hindu

http://www.hindu.com/cp/2009/06/12/stories/2009061250020100.htm

• IndiaFM

http://www.bollywoodhungama.com/features/2007/07/26/2886/

It is unfortunate that some so-called established users sit on some articles and consider those articles as their private property. They bend wikipedia rules, sometime use rules which voilate spirit of wikipedia.

My referenced edit was reverted but this User:Shshshsh has no problem keeping unreferenced text in the article which I quote below: <quote>The film was a box office failure when released, but has since achieved a cult status among Indian audiences.</quote>

I will not call for reference even though they exist because it is against commonsense. Everybody knows it is cult movie.

But at the same time there were much talk about sequel to this movie which was acknowledged by actors, director, producer of this movie and reputed media. And few lines are worth mentioning.

I am really disappointed by this Wikipedia:Gaming the system and users sitting on articles considering those articles their private property.

I give my word, I will never return to wikipedia and I am going to block this account by entering random password.

Thanks!

---

Āditya (talk) 20:40, 25 December 2009 (UTC)