Æñøï, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Æñøï! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

December 2021

edit

Hello Æñøï Re - Walthamstow Stadium and the term flapping - This sentence has a citation so please do not delete. It is not just for dogs fans, the term as mentioned previously is an industry term and is widely used throughout Great Britain. It cannot be considered jargon or we would be deleting thousands of terms from other industries, nearly every scientific article is filled with industry terms i.e. kilopascals. If you want to get a consensus on this then post your comment on the talk page as per wikipedia practices and see if you get a consensus. Then if gained it can be changed. ApricotFoot (talk) 13:42, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2022

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Simona Halep shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Wolbo (talk) 18:24, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

You are trying to force laughably poor material into the encyclopaedia. Either you do not understand how bad the text is, or you simply do not care. Either way, your actions are despicable. Now grow up and go away. Æñøï (talk) 18:28, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Simona Halep, you may be blocked from editing. You're pretty new here so let me say I can pretty much guarantee that if this goes on again and I report it, you'll get blocked, and no one wants that. Bring your case to the talk page and see if the writing can be improved through discussion. I don't think anyone will want it gutted as you did, but who knows. All you can do is try to change minds through discussion. Fyunck(click) (talk) 20:14, 6 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Æñøï reported by User:Fyunck(click) (Result: ). Thank you. Fyunck(click) (talk) 00:44, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

July 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as you did at Simona Halep. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 00:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC)Reply