User:Wyatt.toure/sandbox

Insect foraging cognition edit

 
Insects foraging on a yellow flower

Insects inhabit many diverse and complex environments within which they must find food. Cognition shapes how an insect comes to findsits food. The particular cognitive abilities used by insects in finding food has been the focus of much scientific inquiry[1]. The social insects are often study subjects and much has been discovered about the intelligence of insects by investigating the abilities of bee species.[2][3] Fruit flies are also common study subjects [4].

Learning and memory edit

Learning biases edit

Through learning, insects can increase their foraging efficiency, decreasing the time spent searching for food which allows for more time and energy to invest in other fitness related activities, such as searching for mates. Depending on the ecology of the insect certain cues may be used to learn to quickly identify food sources. Over evolutionary time insects may develop evolved learning biases that reflect the food source they feed on. Biases in learning allow insects to quickly associate relevant features of the environment that are related to food. For example, bees have an unlearned preference for radiating and symmetric patterns — features of natural flowers bees forage on[5]. Additionally, bees that have no foraging experience tend to have an unlearned preference for the colours that an experienced forager would learn faster. These colours tend to be those of highly rewarding flowers in that particular environment[6].

Time-place learning edit

In addition to more typical cues like colour and odour, insects are able to use time as a foraging cue[7]. Time is a particularly important cue for pollinators. Pollinators forage on flowers which tend to vary predictably in time and space, depending on the flower species, pollinators can learn the timing of blooming of flower species to develop more efficient foraging routes. Bees learn at which times and in which areas sites are rewarding and change their preference for particular sites based on the time of day[8]. These time-based preferences have been shown to be tied to a circadian clock in some insects. In the absence of external cues honeybees will still show a shift in presence for a reward depending on time strongly implicating an internal time-keeping mechanism, i.e. the circadian clock, in modulating the learned preference [9]. Moreover, not only can bees remember when a particular site is rewarding but they can also remember at what times multiple different sites are profitable.[10] Certain butterfly species also show evidence for time-place learning due to their trap-line foraging behaviour.[11] This is when an animal consistently visits the same foraging sites in a sequential manner across multiple days and is thought to be suggestive of a time-place learning ability.

Innovation Capacity edit

A bumblebee with experience in the string-pulling task pulls the string to reach an artificial blue flower filled with sugar solution [12]

Insects are also capable of behavioural innovations. Innovation is defined as the creation of a new or modified learned behaviour not previously found in the population [13]. Innovative abilities can be experimentally studied in insects through the use of problem solving tasks [14]. When presented with a string-pulling task, many bumblebees cannot solve the task, but a few can innovate the solution. Those that initially could not solve the task can learn to solve it by observing an innovator bee solving the task. These learned behaviours can then spread culturally through bee populations.[15] More recent studies in insects have begun to look at what traits (e.g. exploratory tendency) predict the propensity for an individual insect to be an innovator [16].

Social aspects of insect foraging edit

Social learning of foraging sites edit

Insects can learn about foraging sites through observation or interaction with other individuals, termed social learning. This has been demonstrated in bumblebees. Bumblebees become attracted to rewarding flowers more quickly if they are occupied by other bumblebees and more quickly learn to associate that flower species with reward [17]. Seeing a conspecific on a flower enhances preferences for flowers of that type. Additionally, bumblebees will rely more on social cues when a task is difficult compared to when a task is simple [18].

Ants will show conspecifics food sites they have discovered in a process called tandem running. This is considered to be a rare instance of teaching, a specialized form of social learning, in the animal kingdom [19]. Teaching involves consistent interactions between a tutor and a pupil and the tutor typically incurs some sort of cost in order to transmit the relevant information to the pupil. In the case of tandem running the ant is temporarily decreasing its own foraging efficiency in order to demonstrate to the pupil the location of a foraging site

Evidence for Cumulative culture edit

Studies in bumblebees have provided evidence that some insects can engage in cumulative culture, the act of refining existing behaviours into more efficient forms. Bumblebees are able to improve upon a task where they must pull a ball to a particular location, a previously socially learned behaviour, by using a more optimal route compared to the route that their demonstrator used [20]. This demonstration of refinement of a previously observed existing behaviour is a rudimentary form of cumulative culture.


Neural basis of insect foraging edit

Role of mushroom bodies edit

 
Diagram of fruit fly mushroom body

One important and highly studied brain region involved in insect foraging are the mushroom bodies, a structure implicated in insect learning and memory abilities. The mushroom body consists of two large stalks called peduncles which have have cup-shaped projections on their ends called calyces. The role of the mushroom bodies is in sensory integration and associative learning.[21] They allow the insect to pair sensory information and reward. Experiments where the function of the mushroom bodies are impaired through ablation find that organisms are behaviourally normal but have impaired learning. Flies with impaired mushroom bodies cannot form an odour association[22] and cockroaches with impaired mushroom bodies cannot make use of spatial information to form memories about locations [23].

Mushroom body plasticity edit

Mushroom bodies can change in size throughout the lifespan of an insect. There is evidence these changes are related to the onset of foraging as well as the experience of foraging. In some Hymenoptera mushroom bodies increase in size when nurses become foragers and begin to forage for the colony.[24] Young bees begin as nurses tending to the feeding and sanitation of the hive’s larvae. As a bee ages it undergoes a shift in tasks from nurse to forager, leaving the hive to collect pollen. This shift in job leads to changes in gene expression within the brain which are associated with an increase in mushroom body size [24] . Some butterflies have also been shown to undergo an experience-dependent increase in mushroom body size [25]. The period of greatest increase in brain size typically is associated with a period of learning through experiences with foraging demonstrating the importance of this structure in insect foraging cognition.

Mushroom body evolution edit

Multiple insect taxa have independently evolved larger mushroom bodies. The spatial cognition demands of foraging has been implicated in cases where more sophisticated mushroom bodies have evolved.[26] Cockroaches and bees, which are in different orders, both forage over a large area and make use of spatial information to return to foraging sites and central places which likely explains their larger mushroom bodies.[27] Contrast this with a Dipteran such as the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, which have relatively small mushroom bodies and less complex spatial learning demands.


  1. ^ Jones, Patricia L.; Agrawal, Anurag A. (2017-01-31). "Learning in Insect Pollinators and Herbivores". Annual Review of Entomology. 62 (1): 53–71. doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-034903. ISSN 0066-4170.
  2. ^ "Bees Have Small Brains But Big Ideas". Scientific American.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
  3. ^ Perry, Clint J; Barron, Andrew B; Chittka, Lars (2017-08). "The frontiers of insect cognition". Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences. 16: 111–118. doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.011. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  4. ^ Maimon, Gaby. "Could Fruit Flies Reveal the Hidden Mechanisms of the Mind?". Scientific American Blog Network. Retrieved 2020-01-30.
  5. ^ "Shape vision in bees: innate preference for flower-like patterns". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences. 347 (1320): 123–137. 1995-01-30. doi:10.1098/rstb.1995.0017. ISSN 0962-8436.
  6. ^ Giurfa, M.; N��ez, J.; Chittka, L.; Menzel, R. (1995-09). "Colour preferences of flower-naive honeybees". Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 177 (3). doi:10.1007/BF00192415. ISSN 0340-7594. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); replacement character in |last2= at position 2 (help)
  7. ^ Zhang, S.; Schwarz, S.; Pahl, M.; Zhu, H.; Tautz, J. (2006-11-15). "Honeybee memory: a honeybee knows what to do and when". Journal of Experimental Biology. 209 (22): 4420–4428. doi:10.1242/jeb.02522. ISSN 0022-0949.
  8. ^ Pahl, M.; Zhu, H.; Pix, W.; Tautz, J.; Zhang, S. (2007-10-15). "Circadian timed episodic-like memory a bee knows what to do when, and also where". Journal of Experimental Biology. 210 (20): 3559–3567. doi:10.1242/jeb.005488. ISSN 0022-0949.
  9. ^ Zhang, S.; Schwarz, S.; Pahl, M.; Zhu, H.; Tautz, J. (2006-11-15). "Honeybee memory: a honeybee knows what to do and when". Journal of Experimental Biology. 209 (22): 4420–4428. doi:10.1242/jeb.02522. ISSN 0022-0949.
  10. ^ Pahl, M.; Zhu, H.; Pix, W.; Tautz, J.; Zhang, S. (2007-10-15). "Circadian timed episodic-like memory a bee knows what to do when, and also where". Journal of Experimental Biology. 210 (20): 3559–3567. doi:10.1242/jeb.005488. ISSN 0022-0949.
  11. ^ Gilbert, Lawrence E. Raven, Peter H. (1980). Coevolution of animals and plants : Symposium V, First International Congress of Systematic and Evolutionary Biology, Boulder, Colorado, August 1973. University of Texas. ISBN 0-292-71056-9. OCLC 6511746.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  12. ^ Alem, Sylvain; Perry, Clint J.; Zhu, Xingfu; Loukola, Olli J.; Ingraham, Thomas; Søvik, Eirik; Chittka, Lars (2016-10-04). Louis, Matthieu (ed.). "Associative Mechanisms Allow for Social Learning and Cultural Transmission of String Pulling in an Insect". PLOS Biology. 14 (10): e1002564. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002564. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC 5049772. PMID 27701411.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  13. ^ Reader, Simon M.; Laland, Kevin N. (2003-09-25), "Animal Innovation: An Introduction", Animal Innovation, Oxford University Press, pp. 3–36, ISBN 978-0-19-852622-3, retrieved 2020-01-29
  14. ^ Griffin, Andrea S.; Guez, David (2014-11). "Innovation and problem solving: A review of common mechanisms". Behavioural Processes. 109: 121–134. doi:10.1016/j.beproc.2014.08.027. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  15. ^ Alem, Sylvain; Perry, Clint J.; Zhu, Xingfu; Loukola, Olli J.; Ingraham, Thomas; Søvik, Eirik; Chittka, Lars (2016-10-04). Louis, Matthieu (ed.). "Associative Mechanisms Allow for Social Learning and Cultural Transmission of String Pulling in an Insect". PLOS Biology. 14 (10): e1002564. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002564. ISSN 1545-7885. PMC 5049772. PMID 27701411.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link) CS1 maint: unflagged free DOI (link)
  16. ^ Collado, Miguel Á.; Menzel, Randolf; Sol, Daniel; Bartomeus, Ignasi (2019-12-23). "Innovation in solitary bees is driven by exploration, shyness and activity levels". doi:10.1101/2019.12.23.884619. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  17. ^ Leadbeater, Ellouise; Chittka, Lars (2007-08-06). "The dynamics of social learning in an insect model, the bumblebee (Bombus terrestris)". Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology. 61 (11): 1789–1796. doi:10.1007/s00265-007-0412-4. ISSN 0340-5443.
  18. ^ Baracchi, David; Vasas, Vera; Jamshed Iqbal, Soha; Alem, Sylvain (2018-01-13). Papaj, Dan (ed.). "Foraging bumblebees use social cues more when the task is difficult". Behavioral Ecology. 29 (1): 186–192. doi:10.1093/beheco/arx143. ISSN 1045-2249.
  19. ^ Franks, Nigel R.; Richardson, Tom (2006-01). "Teaching in tandem-running ants". Nature. 439 (7073): 153–153. doi:10.1038/439153a. ISSN 0028-0836. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  20. ^ Loukola, Olli J.; Perry, Clint J.; Coscos, Louie; Chittka, Lars (2017-02-24). "Bumblebees show cognitive flexibility by improving on an observed complex behavior". Science. 355 (6327): 833–836. doi:10.1126/science.aag2360. ISSN 0036-8075.
  21. ^ Heisenberg, Martin (2003-04). "Mushroom body memoir: from maps to models". Nature Reviews Neuroscience. 4 (4): 266–275. doi:10.1038/nrn1074. ISSN 1471-003X. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  22. ^ de Belle, J.; Heisenberg, M (1994-02-04). "Associative odor learning in Drosophila abolished by chemical ablation of mushroom bodies". Science. 263 (5147): 692–695. doi:10.1126/science.8303280. ISSN 0036-8075.
  23. ^ Mizunami, Makoto; Weibrecht, Josette M.; Strausfeld, Nicholas J. (1998-12-28). <520::aid-cne6>3.0.co;2-k "Mushroom bodies of the cockroach: Their participation in place memory". The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 402 (4): 520–537. doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9861(19981228)402:4<520::aid-cne6>3.0.co;2-k. ISSN 0021-9967.
  24. ^ a b Whitfield, C. W. (2003-10-10). "Gene Expression Profiles in the Brain Predict Behavior in Individual Honey Bees". Science. 302 (5643): 296–299. doi:10.1126/science.1086807. ISSN 0036-8075.
  25. ^ Montgomery, Stephen H.; Merrill, Richard M.; Ott, Swidbert R. (2016-06-15). "Brain composition in Heliconius butterflies, posteclosion growth and experience-dependent neuropil plasticity: Anatomy and plasticity of heliconius brains". Journal of Comparative Neurology. 524 (9): 1747–1769. doi:10.1002/cne.23993.
  26. ^ Farris, Sarah M.; Schulmeister, Susanne (2011-03-22). "Parasitoidism, not sociality, is associated with the evolution of elaborate mushroom bodies in the brains of hymenopteran insects". Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 278 (1707): 940–951. doi:10.1098/rspb.2010.2161. ISSN 0962-8452. PMC 3049053. PMID 21068044.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: PMC format (link)
  27. ^ Farris, Sarah M; Van Dyke, Joseph W (2015-12). "Evolution and function of the insect mushroom bodies: contributions from comparative and model systems studies". Current Opinion in Insect Science. 12: 19–25. doi:10.1016/j.cois.2015.08.006. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)