Bearclaw Manufacturing Is a Los Angeles based that specializes in producing tools for the fire performance community. Although somewhat known for innovating many of the tools that became common in since 2000, it is best known for it's fire swords, fire fans and unique fire eating torches.
 | |
| Industry | Tool Manufacturing Apparel Fire Performance |
|---|---|
| Founded | California, United States (June 1, 2000, as Bearclaw Manufacturing) |
| Headquarters |  719 Heliotrope, Hollywood, California |
Key people | Tedward, Founder |
| Products | Fire Poi Torches Fire Staff Fire Hoops Fire Swords fire fans Fire Fingers Fire Whips |
| Website | Bearclaw Manufacturing |
History
editBearclaw Manufacturing got a tentative start when the founder, EJ "Tedward" LeCouteur moved to California and began constructing furniture that would withstand earthquakes. Of those initial builds, the bookshelves were the most popular. To assist in transport of his book shelves, four finger holes were drilled, side by side, near the top. But the four holes didn't appeal to Tedward's aesthetic, so they were decorated into the current bearclaw logo.
Since he viewed the production of furniture as a hobby, the business faded as he filled the shelving needs of his friends. However, when his primary income sources looked dubious, Tedward started looking at fall-back positions.
Fire tools became the new hobby in 2000 when the owner connected with a local poi spinner and built a fire staff. Almost immediately, he received requests from other fire performers to make performance implements for them. It was during this period that the company's most notable innovations were produced. Late 2000, Bearclaw introduced fire hoops and new, "welded fire swords". By August 2001, more new tools were ready for introduction: fire fingers, several more swords, new kinds of staves, and swinging fire torches. But the sudden appearance of the Dot_bomb, encouraged the hobby to become a business. The first pricelist was established in August 2001, this became the foundation of the first internet site. Over the years, this website has introduced fire hoops, fire_fans, floggers, whips, swinging torches, and myriads of variations on the standard poi, staff and swords to the general fire community.
Body sections
editHeadings and sections
editHeadings are located at the top of sections and subsections, which they delimit. Very short or very long sections and subsections in an article look cluttered and inhibit its flow. Headings help to make an article clearer, and they populate the table of contents that users can choose to view (the default) or not to view, under their "Preferences".
Headings are hierarchical; you should start with a "second-level" heading (two equals signs on each side: ==Heading==). A subsection of a section should have a third-level subheading (===Subheading===), and a subsection of one of these subsections should have a fourth-level subheading (====Subsubheading====). Between sections, there should be only a single blank line; multiple blank lines in the edit window create too much white space in the article.
If the order in which sections should appear in a longer article is unclear, alphabetical or chronological order can be helpful. Alphabetical order is especially useful when sections are divided on the basis of criteria such as country or state.
Section templates and summary style
editMain article. When a section is a summary of another article that provides a full exposition of the section, a link to that article should appear immediately under the section heading. You can use the {{Main}} template to generate a Main article: link.[1]
Other references under the section title. If one or more articles provide further information or additional details (rather than a full exposition—see above), references to such articles may be placed immediately after the section heading for that section, provided they are not wikilinked in the text. These additional references should be grouped along with the {{Main}} template (if there is one), for easy selection by the reader, rather than being scattered throughout the text of a section. You can use one of the following templates to generate these links:
- {{Details}} – this generates For more details on this topic, see
- {{Further}} – this generates Further information:
- {{See also}} – this generates See also:
Paragraphs
editSections usually consist of paragraphs of running prose. Bullet points should be minimized in the body of the article, if they are used at all; however, a bulleted list may be useful to break up what would otherwise be a large, grey mass of text, particularly if the topic requires significant effort on the part of readers. Bulleted lists are typical in the reference and reading sections at the bottom. Between paragraphs—as between sections—there should be only a single blank line; bullet points are not usually separated by a blank line.
The number of single-sentence paragraphs should be minimized, since they can inhibit the flow of the text; by the same token, paragraphs that exceed a certain length become hard to read. Short paragraphs and single sentences generally do not warrant their own subheading; in such circumstances, it may be preferable to use bullet points. See also Wikipedia:Guide to writing better articles#Paragraphs.
Standard appendices
editCertain optional standard sections, when used, should be placed at the bottom of an article. The plural form of the section name should be used.[2] Common appendix sections are discussed below. These sections should all be level 2 headings so that they appear as sections rather than subsections in the table of contents.[3]
When used, appendix sections containing the following information appear after the body of the article in the following order:[4]
- (a) a list of books or other works created by the subject of the article (works),
- (b) a list of internal "wikilinks" to related Wikipedia articles (see also),
- (c) notes and references (notes, footnotes, or references),
- (d) a list of recommended relevant books, articles, or other publications that have not been used as sources (further reading), and
- (e) a list of recommended relevant websites that have not been used as sources (external links).
With some exceptions, any links to other Wikimedia projects appear in further reading or external links sections. Succession boxes and navigational footers go at the end of the article, following the last appendix section, but preceding the category and interwiki templates.
Works
editContents: The "Works" or "Publications" section provides a list of books or other works created by the subject of the article. "Works" is preferred when the works listed includes one or more items that is not a written publication (e.g., music, films, paintings, choreography, or architectural designs). "Bibliography" is occasionally used if the list of works contains only books.
Location: Usually precedes the other optional appendices.[4]
Format: A list, usually ordered chronologically, as explained in more detail at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lists of works).
"See also" section
editContents: The "See also" (less commonly "Related topics") section provides internal links to related Wikipedia articles. "See also" is the most appropriate place to link a Portal with the {{portal}} template.
A reasonable number of relevant links that would be in the body of a hypothetical "perfect article" are suitable to add to the "See also" appendix of a less developed one.[5] Links already included in the body of the text are generally not repeated in "See also"; however, whether a link belongs in the "See also" section is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment and common sense. A "perfect" article then may not have a "See also" section at all, though some links may not naturally fit into the body of text and others may not be included due to size constraints. Links that would be included if the article were not kept relatively short for other reasons may thus be appropriate, though should be used in moderation, as always. These may be useful for readers looking to read as much about a topic as possible, including subjects only peripherally related to the one in question. The "See also" section should not link to pages that do not exist (red links).
Location: The "See also" section, if used, follows the "Works" section, if used.[4]
Format: The links should appear in a bulleted list. It is helpful to alphabetize the links if there are more than a few of them. Also provide a brief explanatory sentence when the relevance of the added links is not immediately apparent. For example:
- Related person made a similar achievement on April 4, 2005.
Notes, Footnotes, or References
editContents: This section, or group of sections, presents the explanatory notes and a list of the references that support the information in the article.
Location: The notes and references appear after the See also section (if any) and before the Further reading and External links sections (if any).[4]
Format: As explained in more detail at Wikipedia:Citing sources#How to present citations, the format of these sections, their titles, and the specific information in each depends on the citation style used in the article. As explained in more detail at Wikipedia:Manual of Style#Consistency, it is inappropriate to change an article from one defined citation style to another unless there is a reason that goes beyond mere choice of style.
Further reading
editContents: A list of recommended books, articles, or other publications that have not been used as sources and may provide useful background or further information.
This section does not include publications that were used as reliable sources in writing this article; these should be cited as references. Websites and online publications are normally listed in the "External links" section instead of in this section, although editors occasionally prefer to merge very short lists of publications and external links into this section. To avoid unnecessary duplication of information, publications listed in any other section of the article should not be included in "Further reading".
Location: This section is placed after the References section and before the External links section (if any).[4]
Format: This is a bulleted list, usually alphabetized, as explained in more detail at Wikipedia:Manual of Style (lists of works). Publications listed in this section are cited in the same reference style used by the rest of the article.
External links
editContents: A list of recommended relevant websites that have not been used as sources. Unlike wikilinks, which are often used within the article's text, external links are normally limited to the "External links" section. Links to external websites used as sources should be listed in the "References" or "Notes" section. External links may be listed in the section "Further reading", instead of having a separate section specifically for external links.
Location: If there is an External links section, it should be last.[4] There are a number of reasons for this, including: So many articles have the External links section at the end that many people expect that. Some External links and references sections are very long, and when the name of the section is not visible on the screen, it could cause problems if someone meant to delete an external link, and deleted a reference instead. Keeping the External links last is also helpful to editors who patrol external links.
Format: External links should be arranged in a bulleted list, with a short description of the link and no blank lines between items. By convention, if the article is about a company or organization, then its official website is the first link in the list.
Links to other Wikimedia projects
editLinks to Wikimedia sister projects other than Wiktionary and Wikisource, including Commons, Wikibooks, Wikinews, Wikiquote, Wikispecies and Wikiversity, should not appear outside of the External links section (create the section if needed). The appropriateness of these and other external links is discussed at Wikipedia:External links. Links to media on Commons that don't mention "Commons" are fine ([[File:...]] will link to Commons if the image is on Commons). Links to Wiktionary (in the format [[wikt:word|]] or [[d:word|]]) may be used outside of External links when a definition is needed for clarity and when there is no Wikipedia article which would serve the purpose just as well. See also WP:Explain jargon and the policy that Wikipedia is not a dictionary.
External links can be in the form "Main page at Wikibooks", {{wikibooks}}, or {{wikibooks-inline}}. See Category:Interwiki link templates to check whether an inline template exists.
Navigational footers, categories, interlanguage links etc.
editVarious navigational aids go at the end of the article, following the last appendix section. The conventional order is:
- Succession boxes and navigational templates
- Categories
- Stub templates. It is usually desirable to leave two blank lines between the first stub template and whatever precedes it.
- Interlanguage links
See also
edit- Help:Editing
- Help:Preferences
- Help:Section
- Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines shows how to use headings on talk pages
Footnotes
edit- ^ Syntax:
{{main|Circumcision and law}}
This produces:
- ^ See, e.g., Wikipedia:External links#External links section.
- ^ Syntax:
== See also ==
* [[Wikipedia:How to edit a page]]
* [[Wikipedia:Manual of Style]]
Which produces:
See also
- ^ a b c d e f This sequence has been in place since at least 2003 (when "See also" was called "Related topics"). See, e.g., http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Layout&oldid=2166480 See also Wikipedia:Perennial proposals#Changes to standard appendices. The rationale is that, with the exception of Works, sections which contain material outside Wikipedia (including Further reading and External links) should come after sections that contain Wikipedia material (including See also) to help keep the distinction clear. The sections containing notes and references often contain both kinds of material and, consequently, appear after the See also section (if any) and before the Further reading section (if any).
- ^ This of course refers only to links related to the topic, not links that are incidental, e.g. linking to a jargon word in a sentence.