User:Santasa99/sandbox14

GA progress

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

1 It is reasonably well written

• (prose, spelling, and grammar):
• (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): , , , ,

• Discussion:

2 It is factually accurate and verifiable.

• (reference section): , , , ,
• (citations to reliable sources): , , , ,
• (OR): , , , ,
• (copyvio and plagiarism): , , , ,

• Discussion:

3 It is broad in its coverage.

• (major aspects): , , , ,
• (focused): , , , ,

• Discussion:

4 It follows the neutral point of view policy.

• Fair representation without bias: , , , ,

• Discussion:

5 It is stable

• No edit wars, etc.: , , , ,

• Discussion:

6 It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

• (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
• (appropriate use with suitable captions): , , , ,

• Discussion:

7 Overall:

8 Pass/Fail: , , , ,

9 y

Drive-by comments/suggestion/remarks:

1 From User:xy :

Response by nominator: