Ms. Marvel
editHey, good luck! I'll be glad to help out in any way to get this one to GA. Note that a lot of text was removed from this version; anything you can use from there that would keep the article informative but not overdetailed in the wrong places, go for it. Stoshmaster recently added the feminist legacy section (which was badly needed), so I'm sure he might be available to help as well, and I know Emperor had an interest in this one. BOZ (talk) 07:56, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
PnJ
editThere was one other issue in the lead that I didn't tackle. The sentence "While it was initially intended to be a six-part miniseries, the popularity of "Pride & Joy" and new ideas from writer Vaughan allowed Runaways to grow into a regular monthly Marvel title." sounds funny. I was thinking about rewriting it, or going with "While it was initially intended to be a six-part miniseries, the popularity of "Pride & Joy" allowed Runaways to grow into a regular monthly Marvel title." but I couldn't find the info about the new ideas in the articles body, so I wasn't sure what to do. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 02:13, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
Bubble Tea!
edit
⊕Assasin Joe talk has given you a bubble tea! Bubble teas promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a bubble tea, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy drinking!
Spread the bubbliness of bubble teas by adding {{subst:bubble tea}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message!
⊕Assasin Joe talk 21:22, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Participants
editHi. I undid your edit at Wikipedia:WikiProject Comics/Participants where you removed some users, as the idea of removing people was kicked around at WT:COMICS a week or two ago and the general feeling was to leave people listed for the time being. Not sure what else you have planned for the list. Last week I meant to switch evryone over to {{user}}, but ran out of time and haven't gone back to it yet. Hiding T 18:43, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
Ah I think the answer is I can be a bit of an eejit and miss obvious things like that - I have the userbox which adds me to the category and am a member of all the work-groups but apparently missed adding myself to the list. So well spotted and thanks for adding me. (Emperor (talk) 19:03, 20 March 2009 (UTC))
- If the accounts haven't been made then how have they added themselves to the list? (Emperor (talk) 00:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC))
- I think that the answer is that a lot of editors have accounts, but they do not create user pages. Most of them will have talk pages, however. Check their contributions as well, there should be activity.--2008Olympianchitchat 01:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed, and it is possible that some have had their edits deleted.
- However, while I am of a "Hotel California" mindset about removing inactive editors (you can check out but you can never leave, some people might burst back into activity years later) but when the account isn't registered (as with User:Jester Press) I think we should remove them. (Emperor (talk) 15:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC))
- Actually, it is Jesterpress (talk · contribs); see the addition to the list at this diff:[1]. It looks like they added an article name rather than their user name. My point is that someone had to have added all of these names to the list. If the user doesn't exist, he probably misspelled the his user name.--2008Olympianchitchat 21:57, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think that the answer is that a lot of editors have accounts, but they do not create user pages. Most of them will have talk pages, however. Check their contributions as well, there should be activity.--2008Olympianchitchat 01:49, 23 March 2009 (UTC)
- I haven't a draft, I was doing it live with awb and then had a software issue and couldn't save it, and ran out of time trying to sort it. I haven't got back to it as yet. Priorities seem to change each time I log in, something else needs my attention. Hiding T 20:59, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
I am still a member.--2008Olympianchitchat 05:17, 21 March 2009 (UTC)
- That list looks good enough, but I'm not a fan of the black and white table. Is there a need to swathe it in a div? Hiding T 18:27, 27 March 2009 (UTC)