User:Praxidicae/Fake source project/sources/asianage.com

Discussion

edit

This is going to require an RFC however this appears to be a less than truthful and forthcoming publication who does not distinguish at all between actual journalistic content and paid for pieces, press releases and doesn't readily identify their actual editorial staff. It should probably be deprecated for most any case as it is largely a publisher of pushed PR.

Sniped

edit

It seems unlikely but needs to be verified.

Owner

edit

Completely unknown, it is not readily or easily identified.

Type

edit

Definitely a lot of P4P, also likely blackhat SEO. It should not be considered a reliable source for establishing notability.

Blacklisted

edit

No

Notes

edit

Absolutely no identification of their editorial process or staff. No author bylines.[1]

Checked

edit

  In progress 3/10/2020

References

edit