User:ErieSwiftByrd/Tumey v. Ohio

Full case nameTumey v. State of Ohio
Citations273 U.S. 510 (more)
Case opinion
MajorityTaft
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend. XIV

Tumey v. Ohio (1927) 273 U.S. 510 is a US Supreme Court case, concerning the due process of Judicial disqualification.

Background

edit

The mayor of the village of North College Hill, Ohio received $12 for every defendant convicted before him. Ed Tumey was convicted before the mayor of unlawfully possessing intoxicating liquor.

Opinion of the Court

edit

But it certainly violates the Fourteenth Amendment and deprives a defendant in a criminal case of due process of law to subject his liberty or property to the judgment of a court, the judge of which has a direct, personal, substantial pecuniary interest in reaching a conclusion against him in his case.[1]


See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ Tumey v. State of Ohio, 273 U.S. 510, 523 (1927)
  • Kastenberg, Joshua E., Chief Justice William Howard Taft's Conception of Judicial Integrity: The Legal History of Tumey v. Ohio (2017). Cleveland State Law Review. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2959072
edit
  • Text of Tumey v. Ohio, 273 U.S. 510 (1927) is available from: Findlaw  Justia 


Category:United States Supreme Court cases Category:1927 in United States case law Category:United States Supreme Court cases of the Taft Court