This is a proposal to insert a new section (either a web page or a pop-up box) into the Afc submission procedure to encourage new Afc acticle submitters to add reliable sources. It would reduce the number of articles that would be rejected immediately for being unsourced. I apologize for the poor graphics.

As you can see, the proposed procedure would NOT check to see if there were references (pretty tricky to implement without error), but the editor would have to be totally confused or actively lie or to get the article submitted without any. Users who did this repeatedly could easily be picked out for special attention. Please post your comments, supportive or otherwise, at User talk:Anne Delong/AfcBox.

STEP 1: USER CLICKS ON AFC SUBMIT BOX


STEP 2: DISPLAY WARNING AND OPTIONS (on a web page with links)

Wait! Have you included citations to independent, reliable sources in your article?

◌ A. No, I forgot. I'll submit my page later.

◌ B. No. What are citations? How do I add them?

◌ C. No. There aren't any, I'm promoting a subject that is new and/or not well known.

◌ D. No. I looked, but I am a new editor and need some help to find them.

◌ E. No, because this is a disambiguation page, a template, or redirect, not an article.

◌ F. Yes, I have included citations to in my article.

◌ G. Cancel


STEP 3: Wait until the user makes a selection.


Did the user select A or G?
  • YES → Display "Your article was not submitted." → END
  • NO → Continue


Did the user select B?


Did the user select C?


Did the user select D?


Did the user select E or F?


Did the user perform some other action such as leaving the page?
  • YES → Display message "Your article was not submitted." → END


STEP 4: Submit the article by existing process, which includes message "Your article has been submitted." → END