Overview

edit

Social judgment theory arose from Egon Brunswik's probabilistic functionalist psychology and his lens model, which are socio-psychological theories.[1] It also comes from judgment theory. SJT is a theory that focuses on the internal processes of an individual's judgment with relation to a communicated message. The concept was intended to be an explanatory method designed to detail when persuasive messages are most likely to succeed. Social judgement theory has evolved since its conception and today covers more than probabilistic functionalist psychology. Some examples of SJT used today are policy capturing and applications to conflict reduction.

Attitude change is the fundamental objective of persuasive communication. SJT seeks to specify the conditions under which this change takes place and predict the direction and extent of the attitude change, while attempting to explain how likely a person might be to change his or her opinion, the probable direction of that change, their tolerance toward the opinion of others, and their level of commitment to their position.[5] The SJT researchers claimed expectations regarding attitude change could be based on the message receiver's level of involvement, the structure of the stimulus (and how many alternatives it allows), and the value (credibility) of the source. Attitude change is influenced by information or ecological cues, which are influences in the environment. Information and ecological cues are direct to the actual judgements of an individual. [2]

  1. ^ Michael E. Doherty; Elke M. Kurz (July 1996). Thinking and Reasoning: 109–140. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  2. ^ Ray W. Cooksey (July 1996). Thinking and Reasoning, 2: 141. {{cite journal}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)