An impacted tooth is one that fails to erupt into the dental arch within the expected developmental window. Because impacted teeth do not erupt, they are retained throughout the individual's lifetime unless extracted or exposed surgically. Teeth may become impacted because of adjacent teeth, dense overlying bone, excessive soft tissue or a genetic abnormality. Most often, the cause of impaction is inadequate arch length and space in which to erupt. That is the total length of the alveolar arch is smaller than the tooth arch (the combined mesiodistal width of each tooth). The wisdom teeth (third molars) are frequently impacted because they are the last teeth to erupt in the oral cavity. Mandibular third molars are more commonly impacted than their maxillary counterparts.
Some dentists believe that impacted teeth should be removed except, in certain cases, canine teeth: canines may just remain buried and give no further problems, thus not requiring surgical intervention. However, removal of asymptomatic, pathology-free, impacted teeth isn't a medical consensus: watchful monitoring may be a more prudent and cost-effective strategy and make the future placement of a dental implant through such impacted tooth a feasible approach.
Classifications enable the oral surgeon to determine the difficulty in removal of the impacted tooth. The primary factor determining the difficulty is accessibility, which is determined by adjacent teeth or other structures that impair access or delivery pathway. The majority of classification schemes are based on analysis on a radiograph. The most frequently considered factors are discussed below.
Angulation of toothEdit
Most commonly used classification system with respect to treatment planning. Depending on the angulation the tooth might be classified as:
Relationship of tooth to anterior border of ramusEdit
Relationship of tooth to occlusal planeEdit
The depth of the impacted tooth compared with the adjacent second molar gives the basis for this type of classification. This was also given by Pell and Gregory and is called as Pell and Gregory A, B and C classification. Relationship to occlusal plane Class A-C
Erupted teeth that are adjacent to impacted teeth are predisposed to periodontal disease. Since the most difficult tooth surface to be cleaned is the distal surface of the last tooth, in the presence of an impacted tooth there is always gingival inflammation around the second molar that is invariably present. Even this minor amount of inflammation can provide bacteria access to a larger portion of the root surface that results in early formation of periodontitis compromising the tooth. Even in situations in which no obvious communication exists between the mouth and the impacted third molar there may be enough communication to initiate dental caries (tooth decay).
Pericoronitis is an infection of the soft tissue that covers the crown of an impacted tooth and is usually caused by the normal oral microbiota. For most people there exists a balance between the host defenses and the oral micriobiota but if the host defenses are compromised like during minor illness such as influenza or an upper respiratory tract infection, pericoronitis results. Another common cause is entrapment of food beneath the gum flap (also called an operculum). Pericoronitis can present as a mild infection or severe infection. In its mildest form it is just a localized tissue swelling and soreness whereas in severe forms the swelling is slightly larger even sometimes creating trismus (difficulty opening the mouth).
Occasionally, an impacted tooth causes sufficient pressure on the roots of adjacent teeth causing it to resorb.
An impacted tooth occupies space that is usually filled with bone. This weakens that area of bone and renders the jaw more susceptible to fracture.
When impacted teeth are retained completely within the alveolar process, the associated follicular sac is also retained along with it. Though in most persons the dental follicle maintains its original size sometimes it may undergo cystic degeneration and become a dentigerous cyst or a keratocyst.
Most commonly the individual complains of food getting lodged beneath the gums and a soreness that is usually confused with throat infections. In slightly milder forms a swelling is visible and mouth opening becomes difficult in severe cases. Pain is invariably present.
Impacted teeth might be extracted or left alone, depending on the dentist (and the health authority's guidelines in that country) and the situation. Extraction might be contraindicated and might be simple or surgical, often depending on the location of the teeth.
In some cases, for aesthetic purposes, a surgeon may wish to expose the canine. This may be achieved through open or closed exposure. Studies show no advantage of one method over another.
- Miloro, M.; Ghali, G.E.; Larsen, P.; Waite, P. (2004). Peterson's Principles of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. 1. B C Decker. ISBN 9781550092349. Retrieved 2015-08-22.
- "Impacted teeth including surgery for canine teeth | Cambridge University Hospitals". cuh.org.uk. Retrieved 2015-08-22.
- https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/wisdom-tooth-removal/ The National Health Service's information page about wisdom tooth removal
- https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1963310/ The Prophylactic Extraction of Third Molars: A Public Health Hazard, Jay W. Friedman, Am J Public Health, 2007
- Ghaeminia, Hossein; Perry, John; Nienhuijs, Marloes E. L.; Toedtling, Verena; Tummers, Marcia; Hoppenreijs, Theo J. M.; Van der Sanden, Wil J. M.; Mettes, Theodorus G. (2016-08-31). "Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth". The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (8): CD003879. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003879.pub4. ISSN 1469-493X. PMID 27578151.
- Anjrini AA, Kruger E, Tennant M (July 2015). "Cost effectiveness modelling of a 'watchful monitoring strategy' for impacted third molars vs prophylactic removal under GA: an Australian perspective". Br Dent J. 219 (1): 19–23. doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.529. PMID 26159980.
- Sanjivan Kandasamy (July 2011). "Evaluation and management of asymptomatic third molars: Watchful monitoring is a low-risk alternative to extraction". American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 140 (1): 11–17. doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2011.05.008. PMID 21724081.
- Mithridade D, Serge SM, Keyvan D, Nedjoua CO, Georgy D, Philippe R (January 2015). "Unconventional Implant Placement IV. Implant Placement through Impacted Teeth to Avoid Invasive Surgery. Long-term Results of 3 Cases". Open Dent J. 9: 15–20. doi:10.2174/1874210601509010015. PMC 4319210. PMID 25674167.
- Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand. Index Copernicus. September 2006. ISSN 0125-2208. Retrieved 2015-08-22.
- Fragiskos, F.D. (2007). Oral Surgery. Springer. p. 126. ISBN 9783540499756. Retrieved 2015-08-22.
- Parkin N, Benson PE, Thind B, Shah A, Khalil I, Ghafoor S (August 2017). "Open versus closed surgical exposure of canine teeth that are displaced in the roof of the mouth". Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 8: CD006966. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006966.pub3. PMC 6483459. PMID 28828758.