Template talk:EastEnders
Latest comment: 16 years ago by 86.5.220.176 in topic Jim Branning
 | This template is written in British English, which has its own spelling conventions (colour, travelled, centre, defence, artefact, analyse) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
Denise edit
Although she is returning, this character is not currently appearing and is therefore not a current character and should remain in the returning section.
Jim Branning edit
I have deleted Jim from the current character bar as he isn't a current character at the moment, he has been gone for so long but if he does return rest assured, he will be put back on. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.5.220.176 (talk) 19:55, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
nowrap? edit
What does it do? -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 20:33, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, it means that Mo Harris will be Mo Harris instead of Mo
Harris. — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 20:53, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Den and Angie edit
Instead of getting involved in edit warring, try discussing it on the talk page first, please. I don't mind who goes first... — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 23:50, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
- A page for a "supercouple" should not go on the template - especially seeing as the article in question just seems like the articles Den Watts and Angie Watts merged into one. Therefore it is a character article, not a storyline article (like Shannis), and should not be included, as we only include current characters on the template. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 11:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree with that. — AnemoneProjectors (zomg!) 15:34, 12 June 2007 (UTC)