Template talk:Demoscene

Significance

Vossanova; don't hate a player - why is Sundown pulled from the Template? I checked with Gargaj first... surely it's significant enough?

portrait or landscape?

i dont think this should be one of the wide ones... do you, phoenix? // Gargaj (talk) 18:32, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I do. It seems that most of the templates covering a particular topic are laid out that way. It works like "for more about the demoscene, go here or here or here". The upper right corner is a better place for infoboxes, i.e. a summary and statistics for the current article. Plus, full width would allow for a broader range of articles, without messing up page layouts as much. If you'd like to see what it would look like here, before changing the original template, I can do that. --Vossanova ^o< 18:53, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Dunno, it seems to be far from unanimous and making it bigger is basically an invitation for people to add more links to vanity articles. If anything we should make it smaller. // Gargaj (talk) 22:45, 20 January 2009 (UTC)

Here, I made a rough navbox template.

I added some related scenes (art, music) but left out vanity-prone group links, and kept the number of party links down. Thoughts (from anyone)? I could even shrink down the width since it doesn't use all the space. --Vossanova ^o< 15:50, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

looks good, i'm just not sure if it's a good idea... i still think the top-right solution is better. // Gargaj (talk) 20:23, 21 January 2009 (UTC)