Template talk:Canada provinces map

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Hairy Dude in topic Appearance on mobile
WikiProject iconCanada: Geography Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Taskforce icon
This template is supported by WikiProject Geography of Canada.
WikiProject iconMaps Template‑class
WikiProject iconThis template is within the scope of WikiProject Maps, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Maps and Cartography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
TemplateThis template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Innovative template! edit

I think there should be more like it for other national subdivision articles, although I wonder about exactly where the map template should be placed - at the bottom like a navigational template (since it serves as a navigational aid), or the top like an infobox (since most map pictures are placed in infoboxes). Any ideas? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Toussaint (talkcontribs) 15:34, 9 March 2007 (UTC).Reply

Appearance on mobile edit

At Provinces and territories of Canada this was used in the "See also" section, in a way that breaks up the list (contrary to MOS:LISTGAP). It looks strange because it's floating right, instead of clearing the margins like an ordinary image does on narrow screens. I moved it before the list so the list isn't broken up, but this squeezes the article text into a very narrow space, making it hard to read. If it's put below the portal links instead, the second entry in the list (which is a sublist of the first entry) is placed below the image, which looks even worse. This issue can't be fixed at the article level because the necessary CSS can't be specified there. Hairy Dude (talk) 11:28, 21 November 2021 (UTC)Reply