Template talk:Brisbane landmarks

Category for "Buildings & Structures"

To improve navigatibility of this template, I propose to link the heading for |group1=, "Buildings & structures", to be linked to Category:Buildings and structures in Brisbane. Any objections?

Also, in line with MOS:HEAD, I think the group headings should not be be written in title case but in sentence case; thus: "Buildings & structures", "Nature and parks", "Cultural institutions". -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:54, 13 August 2009 (UTC)

New section

Maybe this template should have a former or historical section for places that have been demolished such as Brisbane Festival Hall and Cloudland. - Shiftchange (talk) 11:48, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Maybe they should have been left in the template? -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 06:53, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Yes, either way their inclusion has merit. - Shiftchange (talk) 12:53, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

I have just returned them both to their former position in the template. As mentioned, it might be a good idea to create a special historical section for these buildings, as well as for other demolished buidlings of interest. Figaro (talk) 13:36, 24 January 2010 (UTC)

Brisbane Powerhouse

Should the Brisbane Powerhouse occur twice on the one template? The Arts and Culture sections is probably best as it is more general. - Shiftchange (talk) 10:50, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Sport

Sport is on here twice.

I am removing one of them.144.137.191.8 (talk) 06:09, 8 November 2014 (UTC)