Template:Did you know nominations/Zeitgeber

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 23:17, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Lack of referencing

Zeitgeber edit

  • ... that the disruption of a social zeitgeber such as a meal schedule or interaction with others has been linked to episodes of both depression and mania?
  • Comment: article expanded at least fivefold

5x expanded by Bpfeife1 (talk). Self nominated at 21:42, 24 April 2013 (UTC).

  • An interesting article, well-written and with high-quality sources. Date of creation and length are fine. However, citations are unfortunately lacking in a number of places in the article; this needs to be fixed before it can be accepted. Specifically, there are no citations in the "Common examples of zeitgebers" section, and the final sentence of almost every paragraph in the following sections are uncited. Prioryman (talk) 18:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)
  • After more than two weeks, those issues have not been addressed. Schwede66 05:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)