Template:Did you know nominations/Working with Lemons

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:44, 4 October 2018 (UTC)

Working with Lemons edit

(

)

~~... that Working with Lemons's cover of Frozen's "Let It Go" song was the fifth most-watched YouTube video of 2015 in the United Kingdom, when not considering music videos?~~
Sources:
1. "These are the UK's most viewed YouTube clips of 2015". BBC. 2015-12-08. Archived from the original on 2018-08-19. Retrieved 2018-08-19.
2. Boult, Adam (2015-12-10). "The top 10 most-watched YouTube videos of 2015". The Daily Telegraph. Archived from the original on 2018-08-19. Retrieved 2018-08-19.

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Vanessa Delgado

Created by Cunard (talk). Self-nominated at 07:24, 23 August 2018 (UTC).

New enough, long enough, and within policy. Hook is cited and properly formatted. QPQ is done. I don't know if this is the most interesting fact that could be used from the article, but it's interesting enough. Argento Surfer (talk) 13:37, 23 August 2018 (UTC)

Thank you for the review, Argento Surfer (talk · contribs)! There may be more interesting facts in the article. This is the most interesting one I thought of after writing the article. I am open to other suggestions. Cunard (talk) 07:21, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

What do you think of this? Argento Surfer (talk) 12:40, 24 August 2018 (UTC)

Alt1: ~~... that Working with Lemons spent $5.49 making their first YouTube video in March 2014, and their videos were earning $7,000 or more a month by November of that year?~~ Sources: [1] & [2]

Thank you, Argento Surfer (talk · contribs)! Your proposed Alt1 is more interesting and better than my original proposed hook. Cunard (talk) 07:41, 25 August 2018 (UTC)

Reviewer needed for ALT1. Yoninah (talk) 22:39, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

Approving ALT1 and relying on Argento Surfer for the rest of the review. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:34, 13 September 2018 (UTC)

I came by to promote this, but the article is an orphan. Could you link it in another Wikipedia page so it won't get an orphan tag? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 22:54, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Yoninah (talk · contribs), done. Cunard (talk) 23:00, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. Restoring tick per Argento Surfer's review. Yoninah (talk) 23:05, 22 September 2018 (UTC)

Returned from queue per this discussion: WT:DYK#Hook removed from Queue 4. The ALT1 hook is inaccurate and a new one is needed. Yoninah (talk) 19:16, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Came to this discussion after seeing the message at WT:DYK. @Cunard, Argento Surfer, and Yoninah: What about:

ALT2 ... that Working with Lemons participated in an event in Provo, Utah, that broke the Guinness World Record for most people participating in a live nativity scene reenactment?

ALT3 ~~... that Working with Lemons covered the song "Waving Through a Window" from the musical Dear Evan Hansen to alert viewers about suicide prevention?~~

While I'm not sure how to word it, an idea for an ALT4 could involve them being members of the LDS church.

In addition, the last sentence of the second paragraph in the "Hamilton covers" section and the last sentence of the third paragraph of their "other covers" section lack footnotes. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 02:51, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

Thank you. I am fine with using ALT2, ALT3, or the original hook. I have removed the unsourced material.

Cunard (talk) 00:33, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

@Argento Surfer and Yoninah: Are you fine with any of the suggested hooks? Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 15:47, 30 September 2018 (UTC)

I prefer Alt2, but Alt3 is also good. Argento Surfer (talk) 12:26, 1 October 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. The nominator and Argento are fine with ALTs 0, 2, and 3; as I proposed ALTs 2 and 3, a new reviewer is needed to see if either work. Narutolovehinata5 ^tccsdnew 12:53, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

Good work, User:Narutolovehinata5! ALT2 is very hooky, and hook ref is verified and cited inline. Rest of review per Argento Surfer. ALT2 good to go. Yoninah (talk) 20:51, 2 October 2018 (UTC)