Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/William Garnett (professor)

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected by Moswento talky 10:51, 19 February 2013 (UTC).
Not enough original material

William Garnett (professor)

edit
(
)

Created by Rosiestep (talk). Self nom at 02:43, 15 January 2013 (UTC)

  • I can't access more than one of the online refs (if they are subscription only, they should state this, and if a direct link to a Google book page is available, it should be linked) so I can't review this properly; however the hook lacks "hookiness" -- can anything more interesting be found? Espresso Addict (talk) 08:36, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
  • I didn't use a subscription service for any of these references. If a direct link was available to a Google page, I did use it. Here's an ALT1 to spotlight the more notable achievement:
  • Article is new enough and long enough and both hooks are supported. Although the hooks are not very exciting, on reading the article, nothing more interesting springs to mind. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:02, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Per rule 2b, material copied from PD sources doesn't count towards the character minimum, and without that material this article is too short. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:45, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
  • Article doesn't contain enough original material per Nikkimaria; nothing added since. BlueMoonset (talk) 20:57, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/William_Garnett_(professor)&oldid=829341343"