Template:Did you know nominations/Wilburn Hill King

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by  — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:02, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Wilburn Hill King edit

Created/expanded by Donner60 (talk). Self nom at 03:52, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

  • only need one DYK mate. :) Keep the second for another QPQ. New enough and long enough. Article completely supported by inline sources. No images needing to be checked. Hook is properly formatted. Hook is interesting enough. Hooked fact is supported by FOUR inline sources in article text. ARticle is neutral enough. (I don't think "successful" is POV or non-neutral for example. You won. You're probably best described as successful.)
  • Offline sources support cited text and not plagiarised to write article. --LauraHale (talk) 08:12, 7 July 2012 (UTC)
Good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 08:12, 7 July 2012 (UTC)