Template:Did you know nominations/When a man argues against two beautiful ladies like this, they are going to have the last word

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 17:18, 22 March 2024 (UTC)

When a man argues against two beautiful ladies like this, they are going to have the last word

  • ... that no one laughed at the worst joke in legal history? Source: Christopher, Catherine Martin (2019). "Nevertheless She Persisted: Comparing Roe v. Wade's Two Oral Arguments". Seton Hall Law Review. 49: 318.

Created by Tamzin (talk). Self-nominated at 00:32, 17 March 2024 (UTC). Note: at the time of this nomination, DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode. All nominations made by editors with 20 or more prior nominations during this time will require two QPQs for every article nominated. Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/When a man argues against two beautiful ladies like this, they are going to have the last word; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Great hook, although our usual DYK buzzkills may insist on quotation marks around "worst joke in legal history" later on talk. Earwig's a bit high, but that's most because of quotes and proper nouns. AryKun (talk) 11:41, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

Moving to WP:DYKAPRIL. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 12:52, 17 March 2024 (UTC)