Template:Did you know nominations/Waterfall Bay, Hong Kong

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 14:51, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

Waterfall Bay, Hong Kong edit

5x expanded by Bloom6132 (talk). Self nominated at 00:57, 26 February 2014 (UTC).

  • Article was greatly expanded this morning. The article as of 24 hours ago had 528 characters, it now has 2665 which is slightly more than five times, though in the spirit of things it's more significant, going from a thin stub to something substantial. Hook is cited to The Geographical Journal and the remainder of the article is properly cited to appropriate sources. However, I'm not sure the hook is strictly accurate - the water didn't give Hong Kong its name, the bay did. How about ALT2: That Hong Kong got its name from the Cantonese for "fragrant harbour", which described Waterfall Bay? Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 08:09, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  • All the sources that were used all say it was the water (described as "sweet" in the Geo Journal and "fresh" in others) which first gave its name to the bay and then the entire city itself. So I do think it's more for the water in the bay rather than simply just the bay. —Bloom6132 (talk) 09:30, 26 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Okay, the source was offline so I couldn't verify it, but I'm happy to accept that's the case, so this is good to go. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 12:23, 26 February 2014 (UTC)