- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:51, 1 September 2012 (UTC)
Trogloraptor edit
.jpg)
... that the recently discovered Trogloraptor (pictured) of Oregon belongs to an ancient family of cave-dwelling spiders with hook-like feet?
Created/expanded by Illia Connell (talk), Sarefo (talk), Obsidian Soul (talk). Nominated by Illia Connell (talk) at 03:33, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Image is now available here: file:Trogloraptor marchingtoni (Male).jpg
-
- Still not sure what picture is best to use. See Commons:Category:Trogloraptor marchingtoni.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 04:16, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- ALT1:
;_Grants_Pass,_Oregon.jpg)
- ... that the recently discovered Trogloraptor of Oregon gave its name to an ancient family of cave-dwelling spiders with hook-like feet (pictured)?
- -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 09:25, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hm. Trogloraptor is a genus though, not a species.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 09:31, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oops, yes, sorry. Fixed. Shouldn't the current contents of the article reside under the name of the species? -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 15:55, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Nope, per Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life#Article titles, in case of monotypy, the generic name is chosen as the article title. I think because it's sorta like the least common denominator - the highest rank still part of the binomen, and the most commonly used because of brevity (vs. trogloraptorid). I like the wording of your hook better, though the preceding "species" would have to be omitted, I guess. :P Piping Trogloraptor marchingtoni to Trogloraptor could also be an option, but I prefer the shorter Trogloraptor, less of a mouthful and more eye-catching. -- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 17:10, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Oops, yes, sorry. Fixed. Shouldn't the current contents of the article reside under the name of the species? -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 15:55, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Hm. Trogloraptor is a genus though, not a species.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 09:31, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- How about using this as the picture. The two suggested pics (above) are great for showing the animal, but are a bit ho-hum - just another spider. This one is very dramatic and there's something pleasing about using a hook to illustrate a DYK hook! Illia Connell (talk) 17:41, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- On a second thought, I like this one better too. -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 18:53, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
- Agree.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 11:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Alt1 hook fact and reference check. Article length, newness, references are good. No policy issues found. Raptorial hook image checks out. Good to go!--Kevmin § 02:31, 31 August 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review! To sum up, we thus have
- ... that the recently discovered Trogloraptor of Oregon gave its name to an ancient family of cave-dwelling spiders with hook-like feet (pictured)?
- -- Daniel Mietchen - WiR/OS (talk) 21:18, 31 August 2012 (UTC)