Template:Did you know nominations/The Man (Taylor Swift song)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 04:21, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

The Man (Taylor Swift song)

5x expanded by MaranoFan (talk). Self-nominated at 16:29, 1 September 2019 (UTC).

  • The article is well referenced and the hook is interesting, but I don't think it has been 5x expanded. This version from 8 August (before it was turned into a redirect) was 640 characters long (I excluded the Vogue quotation from the character count), while the current version has 2,215 characters. It needs another 1000 characters to qualify as 5x expansion. And the QPQ is missing. -Zanhe (talk) 23:23, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Zanhe, thank you so much for swiftly (lol) pointing that out. Can you check again and post a review?--NØ 04:52, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
  • Man, I'm really impressed with your swift expansion of the article (lol). Everything checks out now. Article is long enough, hook is interesting and verified, QPQ has been added. No copyvio detected. Good to go. -Zanhe (talk) 05:05, 2 September 2019 (UTC)
Shouldn't it be "in her song" rather than "on her song"? Also, after reading the hook the first couple of times I thought that Swift implies in the song that DiCaprio is sexist. A closer reading of the article itself would seem to indicate that, instead, the song is saying that the treatment of DiCaprio by the media demonstrates double standard and sexism by the media. But this distinction is too easily lost in the wording of the hook, and I think the hook is iffy in terms of complying with the "hooks that focus unduly on negative aspects of living individuals should be avoided" requirement. Nsk92 (talk) 21:47, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Hey Nsk92, along with the grammatical correction you suggested I've added an ALT1 if the promoter should find the first hook unsuitable. Cheers!—NØ 00:21, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
OK, very good, thanks. I like the ALT1 hook. I am pininging the nomination's reviewer, @Zanhe:, since it'd be good if the reviewer approves the ALT1 hook as well, just in case. Nsk92 (talk) 00:28, 9 September 2019 (UTC)
  • ALT1 checks out. Good to go. -Zanhe (talk) 01:02, 9 September 2019 (UTC)