Template:Did you know nominations/The Long Take

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 11:48, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

The Long Take

Moved to mainspace by Dharmadhyaksha (talk). Self-nominated at 04:37, 15 October 2019 (UTC).

  • Hi Dharmadhyaksha, review follows: article moved to tmainspace1 4 October; article is of sufficient length; article is cited inline throughout to reliable sources; no overly close paraphrasing noticed (quotations are appropriately indicated); hook is interesting enough, cited in article and checks out to reliable online source; QPQ has been carried out. Looks good to me - Dumelow (talk) 07:22, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Comment: I'd word that with the bold link first, if you want attention for the novel, not the author or Scots, actually doubting that Scot need a link. Also: get Scot and Scott closer together ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:57, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
Rewording per @Gerda Arendt:'s suggestion:
And just for fun, here's ALT2 as well.
I am happy with ALT1, but will leave it to Dumelow to approve. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:06, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
ALT1 is OK but ALT0 is worded more naturally. I am personally not too bothered if the bolded article is at the start or end of the hook. I am not sure what "took look" means in ALT2 and the Long Take article doesn't currently state that the Walter Scott Prize was named for a Scottish novelist named Walter Scott, though it undoubtedly is - Dumelow (talk) 11:26, 15 October 2019 (UTC)
My typo! I meant "took long". And ALT2 was anyways just proposed for fun. Thanks for your overall review. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:36, 15 October 2019 (UTC)