Template:Did you know nominations/The Armorer (Star Wars)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Lee Vilenski (talk) 16:04, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

The Armorer (Star Wars)

Moved to mainspace by Hunter Kahn (talk). Self-nominated at 14:47, 12 February 2020 (UTC).

  • Article moved from user space over redirect on 11 February 2020. Plenty long enough at 32586 characters (5487 words) readable prose size. It cites reliable sources with inline citations and meets other core policies. Earwig's Copyvio tool indicates a possible violation but this is caused by direct quotes in the article [[1]]. All hooks are shorter than 200 characters and are cited in the article. I couldn't access all the sources however, hence the AGF. Are they interesting to a broad audience? Star Wars is a popular thing so I suppose so. I'm not into Star Wars but I am a martial artist so my preference would be ALT2. Whatever nominator and co-ordinators think though.--Ykraps (talk) 12:10, 16 February 2020 (UTC)
    • I'm fine with ALT2. — Hunter Kahn 13:44, 16 February 2020 (UTC)