Template:Did you know nominations/Tears of the Prophets

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Tears of the Prophets edit

(

)

... that the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine episode "Tears of the Prophets" was the final episode to feature actress Terry Farrell (pictured), whose character was killed off?

Reviewed: Woman with Flowered Hat

5x expanded by Miyagawa (talk). Self nominated at 10:33, 8 June 2013 (UTC).

Alt1:... that production crew thought the coffin used for Jadzia Dax, played by Terry Farrell (pictured), in the Star Trek: Deep Space Nine episode "Tears of the Prophets" might have been the same prop used for Spock's body in Star Trek II: The Wrath of Khan? Miyagawa (talk) 10:39, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Striking Alt1, which at 239 characters (excluding "pictured") is way too long for DYK. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:12, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Needs a full review. BlueMoonset (talk) 04:04, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Article - expansion started on 6 June when 1065 characters, now 13163 characters of readable prose, so long enough with 12x expansion; neutral; at least one inline citation to every required paragraph; no copy vios detected using earwig/duplication detector; assessed as start class.
Hook - within length criteria at 166 characters; correctly formatted; and interesting.
QPQ done; image license is cc-by-sa-2.0.

I did a very light copyedit but could the ref for the hook be placed immediately adjacent to the sentence, please? SagaciousPhil - Chat 11:43, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

[Edit conflict.]

Article: The article was expanded more than five times. The article appears to be sufficiently referenced, except for the "Plot" section which is completely unreferenced. I don't know if that's a deal-breaker. A DYK volunteer should advise on this point.

Hook: The hook is an appropriate length, and is referenced by footnotes 2 (offline source accepted in good faith), 4 and 5. — SMUconlaw (talk) 11:51, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

The plot section is not required to be referenced. Sorry about the edit conflict! SagaciousPhil - Chat 11:59, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

No worries, and thanks for the clarification. — SMUconlaw (talk) 13:15, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the reviews. I've added the citation into the lead for the hook fact. Miyagawa (talk) 12:19, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Hook is now cited and referenced in the last sentence of the first lead paragraph. Looks like DYK reviewers are a bit like buses and we all come along at once! SagaciousPhil - Chat 12:26, 19 June 2013 (UTC)