Template:Did you know nominations/Stoke sub Hamdon Priory

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 15:25, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Stoke sub Hamdon Priory

(

)

... that Stoke sub Hamdon Priory (pictured) is not, and never has been, a priory?

Reviewed: James A. Krumhansl

5x expanded by Harrias (talk). Self nominated at 21:19, 26 December 2013 (UTC).

Interesting article with an intriguing (and referenced) hook. Length and recency are fine, images are appropriate and relevant, no copyvios are detected and the article is both well written and well sourced. Good to go. Prioryman (talk) 18:48, 28 December 2013 (UTC)