- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 22:08, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Schwinger limit
edit
- ... that the universe could get a "hernia" with a laser powerful enough to exceed the Schwinger limit (Feynman diagram pictured)?
- Comment: I'm not sure how figurative/misleading these hooks are allowed to be. This hook is based on a cited metaphor in one of the references.
- Reviewed: Height of the Rockies Provincial Park
Created/expanded by Teply (talk). Self nom at 07:37, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- That hook is just too silly and does not reveal much to the reader. A straight statement of what it is is enough, as it is not something that most people know. How about:
- alt1 ... that the strength of light is limited by the Schwinger limit where electrons and positrons are pulled from the vacuum by the strong electric field (Feynman diagram pictured)?
and meanwhile the article is big and new enough. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:13, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
- ALT2:... that light can elastically scatter other light (Feynman diagram pictured) if the electric field strength exceeds the Schwinger limit?
- I think this ALT2 is what you want. It's not as silly and addresses the image more directly. By the way, User:Brews ohare created the image. Teply (talk) 07:19, 24 June 2012 (UTC)
- also no plagiarism found. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 08:55, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
