Template:Did you know nominations/Scarlet-backed Flowerpecker

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:53, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Scarlet-backed Flowerpecker edit

(

)

... that the species name of the Scarlet-backed Flowerpecker means "bloodstained"?

Reviewed: Kichō
Comment: nice pic, highlights reason for hook...

5x expanded by Casliber (talk). Self nom at 13:12, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

The article has not been created or expanded 5x within the past 10 days (1178 days) Jim Sweeney (talk) 14:21, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

It is 422 B (60 words) here, and 2044 B (335 words) currently according to Dr PDAs prose counter...I was counting words, but will find some more bytes. Casliber (talk · contribs) 20:44, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

From what I see you need about 60 more characters to pass a 5x. Im using the character counter found here --Kev min § 22:42, 25 August 2011 (UTC)

Frustrating. It's quite a well-known little critter and finding stuff online has proven remarkably elusive. I think I can manage it... Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:28, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Length now OK. Age, neutrality, sources are fine. No copyvio or plagiarism. No close paraphrasing (as far as it is possible to avoid it given the subject). Hook is fine. I've added a crop of the original picture which loses some of the background. The article is a bit perfunctory - nothing on breeding, social behaviour, diet, etc., etc. - not that this disqualifies it from DYK, but still. Yomangani ^talk 10:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Fully agree with Yomangani, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:05, 26 August 2011 (UTC)