Template:Did you know nominations/Requiem (Saint-Saëns)

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:45, 12 November 2018 (UTC)

Requiem (Saint-Saëns)

edit
Camille Saint-Saëns in 1875
Camille Saint-Saëns in 1875

5x expanded by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 16:23, 16 October 2018 (UTC).

General: Article is new enough and long enough
Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px.
QPQ: Done.

Overall: Good on all counts:

  • Length OK: 3222 characters (517 words) "readable prose size", 5x expansion began 29 edits ago on October 9, 2018
  • Newness: less than five days elapsed between 5x expansion finished 16 oct and 16 oct nom
  • Both hooks are well sourced - Carus Verlag
  • Hook is a bit dry but not completely unsuitable. If I think of a better one, will note it here.
  • Earwig's Copyvio Detector says plagiarism unlikely; the detected overlaps are nearly all in direct quotes of individuals no longer living.

Looks like this passes QPQ. One content nitpick I adjusted here and was reverted. I believe that somewhere in MOS parallel to WP:MOS#Titles of people we say that capitalization should only pertain to a particular work; if it is discussing a generic requiem ("a requiem"), then lowercase is appropriate. ☆ Bri (talk) 23:49, 11 November 2018 (UTC)