Template:Did you know nominations/Red-backed buttonquail

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Allen3 talk 11:39, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Red-backed buttonquail, Yellow-legged buttonquail

edit
Yellow-legged buttonquails, female on left
Yellow-legged buttonquails, female on left

5x expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 10:40, 4 July 2016 (UTC).

Interesting birds, good expansions on few but solid sources. I misread the hook, and others will perhaps do the same. Please think about rewording, - perhaps "leave it to the mates", --Gerda Arendt (talk) 17:23, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
Hmmm... How about
Better, but plural for the males and singular for the females doesn't match well, also "afresh" makes little sense if there was no first breeding (mentioned). I also liked the females as the protagonists ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:05, 5 July 2016 (UTC)
perfect, thank you! Image licensed, and would be a good illustration, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 10:39, 6 July 2016 (UTC)