- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 16:39, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Qulensya
... that a 7-year-old boy from Qulensya was the only fatality on the island of Socotra because of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami?Source: Socotra Island, Yemen: field survey of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami "Nevertheless the only fatality was reported in Qalansiyah on the northwestern coast. In the second largest town of Qalansiyah a 7-yearold was washed away and perished while trying to catch a fish from the exposed seafloor during a drawdown." (page 113)- ALT1: ... that the only fatality caused by the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami on the island of Socotra was a seven-year-old boy from Qulensya? Source: Socotra Island, Yemen: field survey of the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami "Nevertheless the only fatality was reported in Qalansiyah on the northwestern coast. In the second largest town of Qalansiyah a 7-yearold was washed away and perished while trying to catch a fish from the exposed seafloor during a drawdown." (page 113)
- Reviewed: Xochiquetzallia
- Comment: Open to rewording the hook if reviewer has a less clunky suggestion
5x expanded by Fritzmann2002 (talk). Self-nominated at 14:20, 8 February 2022 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
Hook eligibility:
- Cited:
- Interesting:
- Other problems:
- Needs rephrasing
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Consider rephrasing the hook this way:
- ALT1: ... that the only fatality caused by the 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami on the island of Socotra was a seven-year-old boy from Qulensya?
Thoughts? Otherwise, no other issues. I did some very minor ce on the article. Really nice sources, too. Great work expanding articles in need of some TLC. – TCMemoire 16:48, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- That sounds much better, thanks! I was having trouble trying to figure out how exactly to phrase the hook so I appreciate the assist. Fritzmann (message me) 17:51, 13 February 2022 (UTC)
- @TCMemoire: was there anything else that needed to be done with the article? Thanks! Fritzmann (message me) 19:58, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
