Template:Did you know nominations/Polydora glycymerica

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 11:57, 8 December 2018 (UTC)

Polydora glycymerica, Glycymeris yessoensis edit

Created/expanded by Cwmhiraeth (talk). Self-nominated at 10:54, 26 November 2018 (UTC).

  • both articles are long enough and within policy and new enough. Hook is short and interesting. Only problem is that the hook fact is not cited inline on Glycymeris yessoensis. L293D ( • ) 14:19, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
@L293D: Your comment is strange in two ways. As far as I can see, the hook fact is sourced inline in both articles, in Glycymeris yessoensis this is the last sentence in the Ecology section. The other strange thing is the message on my talk page, which implies that you have unreviewed an article I had reviewed while new page patrolling. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 19:20, 26 November 2018 (UTC)
my bad, didn't see that. When I read Polydora glycymerica, the page Curation script had a grey icon (indicating that the page is not patrolled) so I clicked it but apparently I unpatrolled the page instead and left you an awfully dumb automatic message without even being aware of it. L293D ( • ) 02:26, 28 November 2018 (UTC)
That's fine, I thought something like that had happened! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)