Template:Did you know nominations/Politics of the Philippines

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 03:52, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Politics of the Philippines

Improved to Good Article status by Chipmunkdavis (talk). Self-nominated at 16:30, 28 November 2021 (UTC).

  • Article was promoted to GA status on time and meets DYK requirements. Close paraphrasing was not found and a QPQ has been provided. ALT0 is cited inline and verified; ALT1's source has a paywall so I am assuming good faith here. Article is technically good to go, but I'm withholding giving final approval for now, not because of any deficiencies, but because the article is indeed interesting and additional hooks could probably be proposed here (though both hooks are good: I have a slight preference for ALT1 myself). Also, while not a DYK issue, I'd suggest mentioning that the President/VP/Senators/Representatives/Justices all have to be natural-born citizens, since it's not currently mentioned in the article. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:53, 2 December 2021 (UTC)
@Chipmunkdavis: Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 09:33, 14 December 2021 (UTC)
@Narutolovehinata5: sorry, it's been a very busy period and I forgot about this. Are there particular topics you would like me to try making hooks for? As for the natural-born part if you have a source I'm happy to work that in (especially a secondary source), but I don't have time right now to go out looking. CMD (talk) 17:26, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
@Chipmunkdavis: Is the constitution itself not a good enough source? It's mentioned multiple times there. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 23:15, 16 December 2021 (UTC)
Helps regarding due weight and interpretation. Given recent court cases there are probably secondary sources out there. I'm sure I'll have an eye out for them now that it's in my head. CMD (talk) 21:48, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
  • @Chipmunkdavis: Given that there are no DYK-related issues with the article itself and both of my suggestions were more on the "how to improve the article" side rather than actual DYK concerns, I'm willing to approve this if you're unable to think of any other hook suggestions. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:32, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

Some alts:

CMD (talk) 15:17, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

  • Thank you for the new hooks. In order of personal preference, ALT1, ALT5, and ALT4 are approved; however I will leave the final choice in hook to the promoter. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 10:39, 1 January 2022 (UTC)
ALT5 to T:DYK/P5