- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by ~ RobTalk 15:42, 1 September 2015 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Panther Run edit
.jpg)
Panther Run
- ... that about 100 percent of the Panther Run (pictured) watershed is forested?
Moved to mainspace by Jakec (talk). Self-nominated at 02:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC).
: New enough, long enough, sourced. QPQ done. Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 22:33, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
This is a bit better than other reviews from this user, but is still inadequate: it doesn't check any of the "Within policy" criteria and fails to review the various criteria surrounding the image, all of which are required in a DYK review. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
This article is new enough and long enough. The image is attractive and properly licensed. The article is neutral and within policy. The hook has an inline citation but would be better, in my opinion, if it were rendered as
- ALT1 ... that virtually all of the Panther Run (pictured) watershed is forested? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:58, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: ALT1 is okay; the prep builder can decide which one they like better. --Jakob (talk) aka Jakec 10:50, 22 August 2015 (UTC)
- Good to go with either the original hook or ALT1. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 04:56, 1 September 2015 (UTC)