Template:Did you know nominations/One Commercial Street
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: rejected by PanydThe muffin is not subtle 21:07, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
One Commercial Street, Poor door
edit( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links: )
- ... that One Commercial Street, London will have a separate poor door for residents of the cheaper apartments?
- Reviewed: Cream of broccoli soup
- Comment: double nomination
Created by Edwardx (talk), Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 14:09, 30 August 2014 (UTC).
One Commercial Street is marked as a stub and reads like one. It is also just barely over 1,500 characters and that includes a significant amount of text that's not really about this building. To be honest, I'm not even certain, the sources cited in the article are enough to clearly establish the topic's notability.- Poor door has an unsourced paragraph.--Carabinieri (talk) 13:41, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
- Edwardx, it's been almost a week since I pinged you on this one. I've taken a look at the articles, and in addition to the issues already raised, there's the fact that 369 characters from the poor door article were copied into One Commercial Street. By DYK rules, this requires that One Commercial Street is a 5x expansion of that copied material, or 1845 prose characters. It's currently 1656 prose characters, and has a stub template; it also reads like a stub, with incomplete sentences, some tense issues (as the building has opened, using future tense to describe it isn't appropriate; it certainly isn't appropriate for the hook, since the source indicates that the elevator serving the building's poor door has already broken down), and some claims that definitely need sourcing, like the construction suspension and subsequent purchase. It may be that One Commercial Street will ultimately have to be dropped from the nomination, leaving poor door, but the entire nomination will have to be closed if you fail to respond. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:17, 17 October 2014 (UTC)
No response to pings and no edits to the article, despite Edwardx having made several dozen edits on Wikipedia in the interim, including a new DYK nomination. Closing as unsuccessful. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:51, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
