Template:Did you know nominations/Notre Père

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by 97198 (talk) 22:32, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Notre Père

  • Reviewed: to come

Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self-nominated at 14:30, 2 December 2019 (UTC).

  • The article was written on 25 November and nominated on 2 December which makes it eight days old, thus it is not new enough. QPQ was also not done. Other than that, with 1788 characters (294 words) "readable prose size", it is long enough. The article is well sourced, using inline citations. It is written in neutral tone and I found no evidence of plagiarism. The hook offline citation is accepted AGF. The hook is reasonably interesting. Sadly, I'm not sure what can be done with the age problem. --Muhandes (talk) 14:21, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you for the review. I reviewed now Template:Did you know nominations/Junggar Basin. I tend to be lenient with "age" problems of others, and you could do the same ;) - You could also ask for another pair of eyes. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:14, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
I didn't know this was an option. Seven days or eight should not matter much. Good to go. --Muhandes (talk) 16:47, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
Thank you, that's sweet. You can argue WP:IAR if asked for justification. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:57, 5 December 2019 (UTC)
One should be able to argue The Golden Rule. --Muhandes (talk) 17:34, 5 December 2019 (UTC)