- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 09:39, 23 September 2023 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Ninja of Heisei
- ... that the Ninja of Heisei who robbed places in his ninja costume was a 74-year-old elderly Japanese man at the time of his arrest? Source: Japanese police say they have finally caught a prolific thief who dressed as a ninja to carry out raids - and were surprised to find he was 74.
- ALT1: ... that the Ninja of Heisei was a 74-year-old man who robbed places in his ninja costume in Japan? Source: Japanese police have finally arrested a long-sought after thief who dressed as a ninja during burglaries. He is 74.
- Reviewed:
- Comment: Please suggest modification(s) or a better hook as this is my first DYK submission and so it may not be perfect.
Created by Raydann (talk). Self-nominated at 23:18, 12 July 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Ninja of Heisei; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Is there any information on whether he was tried and convicted? All the sources in that article are from 2017 when he was arrested. I appreciate that Time quotes him as saying "If I were younger, I wouldn’t have been caught. I’ll quit now as I’m 74 and old enough.", but that's not the same as an actual conviction. As per WP:SUSPECT (and WP:BLP1E) I'm not sure the article itself is currently suitable, regardless of DYK. Garnet-Septagon (talk) 08:58, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Garnet-Septagon, thanks for reviewing the DYK. You're right, I can't seem to find any routine coverage for this WP:BLPCRIME. All the sources are from a similar time period of October 2017 and revolve around the same facts, and none of them talks about an actual conviction. Under WP:BLP1E it is correct to say this individual was only covered in reliable sources for one singular event. ❯❯❯ Raydann(Talk) 20:18, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
- I have to agree here. If there's no lasting coverage then I'm not sure if this is even notable. I suggest the article be put up for AFD to test notability. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 11:24, 1 August 2023 (UTC)
- @Narutolovehinata5, Garnet-Septagon, and Raydann: Refreshing the record, this was kept at AfD in a discussion closed on 22 August. How should this nomination proceed? Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:34, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
If the article was kept at AFD then that sorts out the notability issue, but other article issues still need to be addressed, if any. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 01:35, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
New enough and long enough. QPQ-exempt nominator. Hook fact checks out, and there are no textual issues. Things look okay here. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:42, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
